Blog

Free Throw Conondrum

01/20/2013 19:54

Free throw shooting abillity is like common sense.  Everyone should have it... but through a ununderstandable turn of events throughout basketball history, it has become a cherished skill, instead of a given.  Anyone can shoot free throws.  It is the most practiced shot in basketball.  If you play basketball, you should make free throws.  Yet, a player is considered elite when his percent is a mere 90%.  Every player should be at at least 80%.  Anything less is an inexcusable lack of effort.  But for now, until coaches and players everywhere wake up and realize what an issue this has become, players like Scott Wood and Jordan Hulls will be known by college basketball fans everywhere, purely because they shoot free throws well... just like a person with common sense is revered as an intellectual these days. 

VCU: A Final Four Contender... but

01/20/2013 11:24

This VCU team is deeper and more talented than the one that made it the Final Four.  Havoc has evolved from a prototype, to a sucessful machine.  However, with further development comes a bigger weakness.  When the zone defense was first invented, it was unstopable... but as its use spread, more and more scouting teams dedicated time to putting a stop to it.  Havoc is more vunelarable than ever, and good teams are able to exploit its weaknesses more and more.  For one, teams can get out in transistion and score easy.  For another, teams can get the ball inside, and easily post up against VCU.  It's not that their interior is weak, it's that their defensive strategy leaves a hole their.  As a fan of VCU, I've watched at least 7 of their games this year, and can say that this team is better at defense than that Final Four tema, but they aren't as good at offense.  Troy Daniels gets national attention as a 3pt shooter, and against the weak defenses of teams like Fareleigh Dickinson, East Tennessee State, and Duquesne, he is a deadly exterior sniper, but against mid-major to major level defenses, he becomes a capacity scorer.  There is where the problem lies.  The problem is not that VCU is too reliant on the three, they are not.  It's the 3's they take that are of concern to me.  That final four team had a sucessful offensive identity, not just a defensive one.  The Final Four squad would penetrate and kick, producing open 3 for their excellent shooters.  The 3pt shooters this year are as good, if not better than that team, but they are forced to take unfavorable shots.  The offensive identity of VCU this year is outside in.  Redic and Haley don't get nearly enough touches on the inside.  The majority of VCU's interior shots are layups by guards, who look to shoot the 10ft jumper, instead of kicking to the open 3 pt shooter.  Troy Daniel's 3's are primarly jumpers either initatied by him, or by a short pass from a guard 16ft out from the basket.  He is deadly off the catch, but the lack of screening and penetration means he takes shots that are too contested.  If they penetrate and kick, they could be a final four, top ten type team. 

Another offensive issue for VCU is pace.  They do not get into an offensive flow well.  They have seen sucess when they get out in transistion and get layups, then kick for a three.  VCU is an energy based defensive team.  They should translate that energy onto offense.  They need to takes shots in the first 15 seconds of the shot clock instead of continuing on with the roller coaster that is their offense.  They are a run based scoring team, by developing more of a high-paced constant identity on offense they will be more of a consitent scoring team.  They also have issues of free throws.  They have some great nights, and some bad ones.  Perhaps their high pace game plan makes it tough to chill out and shoot a set shot.  They need to develop more consistency on offense.  VCU has the type of team to be top 10 in both defense and offense, but they avert to much of their practice to developing a Havoc brand defense... they need to take the time to develop a Havoc offense. 

Extremely Early Bracketology for Preseason 2013-2014

01/20/2013 11:06

I had a day off from school, so I took some time to put together a preseason bracketology for next year.  This assumes that all players will stay in college, which I know will not happen.  This just helps me organize my thoughts, to make it easy to make early bracketology next year.

Preseason Bracketology 2013-2014

  1. MICHIGAN 
  2. DUKE
  3. Indiana
  4. GONZAGA
  5. Maryland
  6. MEMPHIS
  7. UCLA
  8. KENTUCKY
  9. Ohio State
  10. OKLAHOMA STATE
  11. Texas
  12. North Carolina
  13. North Carolina State
  14. GEORGETOWN
  15. Michigan State
  16. Syracuse
  17. CREIGHTON
  18. NEW MEXICO
  19. Las Vegas
  20. Louisville
  21. VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH
  22. HARVARD
  23. Colorado
  24. Missouri
  25. Arkansas
  26. Tennessee
  27. Boise State
  28. California
  29. Baylor
  30. Florida
  31. Kansas
  32. Arizona
  33. Minnesota
  34. Iowa
  35. Marquette
  36. Connecticut
  37. Pittsburgh
  38. Indiana State
  39. Arizona State
  40. Alabama
  41. St. John’s
  42. Cincinnati
  43. San Diego State
  44. Kansas State
  45. Rutgers
  46. Massachusetts
  47. Boston College
  48. Florida State
  49. Saint Joseph’s
  50. NORTH DAKOTA STATE
  51. DETROIT
  52. LONG BEACH STATE
  53. TOWSON
  54. VERMONT
  55. IONA
  56. SOUTH ALABAMA
  57. DAVIDSON
  58. AKRON
  59. LOUISIANA TECH
  60. WEBER STATE
  61. MERCER
  62. EASTERN KENTUCKY
  63. LEHIGH
  64. BRYANT
  65. ORAL ROBERTS
  66. NORFOLK STATE
  67. CHARLESTON SOUTHERN
  68. SOUTHERN

First Four Out

Virginia

Oregon

Louisiana State

Brigham Young

Next Four Out

Iowa State

South Florida

South Carolina

Northern Iowa

Further Four Out

Notre Dame

Providence

George Mason

La Salle

Far Four Out

Xavier

San Francisco

Villanova

Purdue

 

 

Tags

The list of tags is empty.